Tuesday, April 7, 2020

The Eyes of My Mother

When Self-Isolation Leads to Horror

The most common horror movie tropes deal with supernatural evil, or sometimes a horror brought about by some high profile social ill like corporate greed or environmental pollution. There are, however, other potential sources of horror which are less often explored on film. One of them is loneliness, which is explored by first time director Nicolas Pesce in the film The Eyes of My Mother.

While some horror films have touched on loneliness and self-isolation to a degree, notably Stanley Kubrik's The Shining, few have tackled it as head-on as The Eyes of My Mother. The plot centers around Francisca, the daughter of a Portuguese immigrant family living in rural America whose mother is killed by serial killer and whose father descends into an alcoholic depression, leaving young Francisca isolated and lonely in an empty farm house. There are some echoes of Polanski's Repulsion here, as we are witness to Francisca's descent into madness when left alone. But unlike Repulsion, The Eyes of My Mother isn't about a rapid crash over a weekend, but a slow unravelling as Francisca grows from child to adult walled off from human interaction.

The film is part horror movie, part indie arthouse flick. Shot in black-and-white (with some gorgeous cinematography), the film is partially in English, partially in subtitled Portuguese. While this no doubt limits its appeal with both horror fans eager for ever greater Grand Guignol gore and jump-scares, and arthouse cinephiles who tend to look down on genre filmmaking, for the right audience The Eyes of My Mother delivers a wholly unique and haunting horror show set in the seemingly mot mundane of places.

***1/2 out of *****

Wednesday, April 1, 2020

New Fun Comics #1

New Fun Comics #1

The Birth of Comic Books

In early 1935, Major Malcolm Wheeler-Nicholson - a flamboyant character who someone is no doubt writing a screenplay about as we speak - jump-started the comic book business, by creating the first comic book of all-original material (rather than reprinted newspaper strips). For all practical purposes, this was the beginning of what would later become the juggernaut of DC Comics. 

Aside from a handful of text articles and stories, New Fun #1 was an anthology of comics including:

"The Magical Crystal of History" by Barreaux, a kids time-travel adventure. "Oswald the Rabbit" a funny animal tale featuring Disney's proto-Mickey Mouse. A disjointed war comic, "Wing Brady, Soldier of Fortune",  a ponderous comic adaptation of Sir Walter Scott's "Ivanhoe", "Buckskin Jim, The Trailblazer", a crudely drawn Western, the Fairy Tale "Bubby and Beevil", the standout one page "2023 Super-Police", a sci-fi cop story, and notably, a full color comic ad for Ralston Purina featuring Tom Mix.

Today the comic is a curiosity, more notable for its historic importance than its artistic merits. It is however a clear blueprint for Action Comics and Adventure Comics, and would later introduce some of DC's long-running characters.

** out of *****

Tuesday, March 24, 2020

The Andromeda Strain

The Andromeda Strain

Realistic to a Fault

One of the most frequent complaints any movie fan hears about movies in general is that the film treatment of X profession or fill-in-the-blank social issue is not "realistic". To which my response is, yes, because movies aren't real life. If it was realistic, chances are you probably wouldn't want to watch it.
Such is the case with The Andromeda Strain. Written by Michael Crichton, who was still working on his M.D. at Harvard Medical School at the time, the novel, which screenwriter Nelson Gidding and Director Robert Wise took pains to faithfully adapt, is nothing if not realistic. Every scientific fact, every piece of technology was either in existence or theoretically possible (and much of it has been realized since). This does not, however, make for very riveting viewing.

The story deals with a satellite that crashes in a small Nevada town, carrying with it a spaceborne contagion that rapidly spreads. The film then unfolds over the next few days as scientists race to isolate and cure this hitherto unknown disease.


The trouble is that 'race' is a relative term, most of the film deals with scientific inquiry which in the real world takes years, or even decades, but is compressed to a mere 131 minutes, but even at such great compression, it is apt to seem tediously long and dull to those not of a scientific bent to begin with.


So, for the limited audience of hard science fiction fans out there, it may be a pretty decent show, particularly for the accuracy of the various sciences such as microbiology and biochemistry portrayed in the film. For the vast majority of humanity, it's likely to be a really long yawn-fest. (originally reviewed Oct. 26, 2013)

** out of *****

Saturday, March 14, 2020

Contagion

Midling Thriller Based On A Very Possible Scenario 

(originally reviewed on July 21, 2012)

I've mentioned before that 4 decades of Star Wars has made it so the general public thinks that if it doesn't have lasers or robots, it's not science fiction. Obviously that's not the case as demonstrated by Contagion. Contagion is a science fiction film, specifically one where the science we are talking about is the biological sciences, and is based on the actual events of the recent outbreaks of Avian and Swine Flues. The heroes here are scientists, racing to try to isolate the virus and mitigate its damage.
It's understated in typical Soderbergh fashion. And while it's a well made, if subdued, indie thriller, it's already been done a lot of times before: The Andromeda Strain and Outbreak come immediately to mind. Its most redeeming factor is perhaps a greater realism than its predecessors.

It might be worth a look for fans of medical thrillers, or those that want to see a zombie apocalypse film sans zombies. Otherwise, I wouldn't make it your first choice film on a Friday night.

***1/2 out of *****

Sunday, October 6, 2019

Thongor, the Barbarian Hero That Almost Became More Famous Than Conan.

In the 1960s the Sword and Sorcery genre was experiencing a revival due to the efforts of a number of writers and editors in New York, as well as an attempt to diversify from the waning superhero genre at Marvel Comics. The former effort was spearheaded by Lin Carter, a fiction editor who created the barbarian hero Thongor. The latter effort was spearheaded by Roy Thomas, Marvel's rising star (who would eventually succeed Stan Lee as Editor-in-Chief).

But Thongor was eclipsed by Conan due to a number of factors. Conan had more success in print in the U.S. and U.K., largely due to effective marketing of Robert Howard's literary properties by L. Sprague de Camp,Lin Carter himself. Carter further back-burnered his own character by re-writing a number of his Thongor stories as "official" Conan stories instead.

Over at Marvel, Thomas had planned to adapt Thongor to Marvel comics, but later scrapped the idea in favor of obtaining the license to Conan the Barbarian instead. Though Marvel would eventually get around to adapting some of the Thongor stories in the anthology "Creatures on the Loose".

Fortunately, die-hard fans have kept his work alive, and as recently as 2012 a new collection of Carter's Thongor stories, Young Thongor, appeared. Prominent blogger The Groovy Agent also has scanned many of the long out of print Marvel Thongor stories at his excellent blog, Diversions of the Groovy Kind.

Monday, September 30, 2019

Jonah Hex #60

Sixty issues in, and Jonah Hex was still going strong. Michael Fleisher's dedication to scripting one character for the long-haul is something we just don't see with comic writer's and publishers today. All told Fleisher would write Jonah Hex's adventures for over 13 years(!); nowadays it's lucky to see a writer last for 13 issues.

Anyway, at this point in the story Jonah is taken out of the Old West for the first time, as he's Shanghaied for China and forced to do the bidding of a local warlord.

The backup story has El Diablo confronting a religious sect that is believed to be responsible for livestock rustling and the disappearance of a child. It seems at this point that El Diablo is basically an Old West version of The Spectre.

Overall, it''s a fine issue, though far from being a must-read issue.

Monday, July 22, 2019

Gunman's Walk

Gunman's Walk

Not your average Western


One topic dealt with too rarely in Westerns is the phenomenon whereby early settlers to the Old West, before the law came, too often flouted the law, even after it did come. Fans of the HBO series "Deadwood" are very familiar with this in the form of Timothy Olyphant's character, the saloon keeper Al Swearengen.

But decades before "Deadwood" would revive the theme, a brilliant little film called Gunman's Walk perfected it. In it, Van Heflin plays no-nonsense horse rancher Lee Hackett who has his hands full with two sons, Ed Hackett (Tab Hunter), and Davy Hackett (James Darren). But when Lee tries to use his influence to protect Ed from a murder charge things spiral out of control for all involved.

The film deals not only with the sense of entitlement of the white settlers as expressed through this conflict, but also deals head-on with the rampant anti-Native racism is inescapably intertwined with the setting.

The Good: 
  • powerful performances by Van Heflin and Tab Hunter
  • propulsive pacing
The Bad:
  • the usual Native Americans portrayed by Anglos in redface
Stuff to watch for:
  • horses galore
Pairing: Chili and hardtack

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

The 36th Chamber of Shaolin

The 36th Chamber of Shaolin

50 Years Later The 36th Chamber of Shaolin Endures as a Kung Fu Classic



Amongst fans of kung fu films, The 36th Chamber of Shaolin is widely regarded as the greatest kung fu film of all time. While I'd argue that Once Upon a Time in China, or Enter the Dragon may be more deserving of that designation, I won't argue about the overall quality of The 36th Chamber of Shaolin.

The film stars then-newcomer Chia-hui "Gordon" Liu, a Yul Brynner lookalike in  the story of real life Chinese folk hero San Te, a young man who joins the Shaolin Temple to learn kung fu to teach the people of his village how to fight back against the Ming Dynasty thugs who oppress them. What follows is an extended series of training scenes as San Te learns kung fu by performing what seems at times to be meaningless tasks in various "chambers" of the Temple.

Therein lies both the film's greatest appeal, as well as its greatest weakness. To fans of martial arts, the realism and discipline in the rigorous training is the highlight of the film; it doesn't get any more pure than that. On the other hand for more general audiences, the plot seems stuck in neutral while we spend nearly half the film's running time with the hero in training for his future revenge plans.

Nevertheless, the influence of the film can't be denied. Nearly all subsequent martial arts films, including American films like The Karate Kid and Kill Bill, owe at least their training sequences, if not more to The 36th Chamber of Shaolin, not to mention other stuff films like The Empire Strikes Back, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, and the music of the Wu-Tang Clan.


The Good: 
  • the cinematography and fight choreography are top-notch
  • bits of Buddhist philosophy
The Bad:
  • takes the patience of a Buddhist monk
Stuff to watch for:
  • an opening credit sequence of Liu practicing kung fu is almost ballet-like in beauty
  • perhaps the best fight scene involving a three-section staff (sānjiĆ©gùn) ever filmed
Pairing: Chicken McNuggets with B-Dubs Asian Zing sauce, and hot tea.

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Sunday, December 16, 2018

Moana

Moana

Disney does what Disney does best


Sometime around 2004 Disney was in a slump. The last few in-house animated films, Home on the Range, Brother Bear, Treasure Planet, etc. were largely forgettable, while their partner Pixar was killing it with the likes of Finding Nemo, Monsters Inc., and The Incredibles. The solution of course was to ditch 2D animation in favor of 3D (though that wasn't their only problem as the next film Chicken Little, can attest). In any case, one of the last actually memorable films before that transition was the Polynesian not-a-princess film Lilo & Stitch, a commercial success (though not as great as Disney had hoped, never taking top place at the box office), but still critically acclaimed (and bearing a suspicious resemblance to The Iron Giant). Having already done an Asian princess (Mulan), and the long-overdue African-American princess (The Princess and the Frog), and still trying to exorcise their less-than ideal indigenous princess (Pocahontas), it's probably not surprising that they decided to give another go at creating a Pacific Islander not-a-princess in the 3D era.

Which brings us to Moana. Honestly Moana slickly grabs and repackages a lot of the things that worked best in previous Disney films (anthropomorphic islands in the Pixar short Lava, traditional island music of The Little Mermaid, and the growing cultural sensibilities that began with Mulan and evolved through Lilo and Stitch and beyond

While none of the songs are as memorable as those from the heyday of The Little Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast, they at least give the illusion of authenticity, with "Moana's Theme", and "You're Welcome" (who knew "The Rock" could sing?), being the main standouts.

Basically the plot is a straight up Hero's Journey story with a female lead - an eight-year-old not-a-princess (as they take pains to remind you) princess story that hits exactly all the right notes to make it an instant classic. You know you're being manipulated, but it's still hard not to like it.


The Good: 
  • no talking animals
  • no shoehorned-in love story
  • a semi-decent David Bowie rip-off
The Bad:
  • the sea is an ultimate deus-ex-machina; saving our heroine from a watery grave countless times
Stuff to watch for:
  • post credit sequence
  • references to many other Disney movies
Pairing: if you don't have access to anything traditional, any Tiki cocktail will do.

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows pt 2

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows pt 2

The finale like its protagonist is a redeemer.


Last film is one of the best.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 1 suffered from summarizing way too much plot, and really should have been expanded to two films - making the concluding book adaptation a trilogy - but given they decided to do it in two, it's best they made the first part the overstuffed one, because that freed up Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 2 to be the worthy climax we all wanted.

With a few of the horcruxes destroyed, Harry and friends set out to destroy the rest - which leads them back to Hogwarts, and a final showdown with Lord Voldemort and his army, who lay siege to the castle.


Finally we get epic fantasy that is less Chronicles of Narnia, and more Lord of the Rings. And, best of all, everything holds together well. There are only a few small plot holes (unlike part 1, which was rife with them), and generally everything makes sense. Granted, it's all a little predictable, but at lest it's dazzling enough that that doesn't matter so much - besides, most of the series' fans also read the books, so there wasn't going to be much room for surprises anyway.





The Good: 
  • All the major plot lines are resolved
The Bad:
  • A bit predictable
Pairing: Blood orange shandies and Reese's cups (10 points if you get why)

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows pt 1

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows pt 1

Worst film in the series... unfortunately there's no way to skip it


Harry and friends running aimlessly through
some foggy woods. Very apropos.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is not a short book. At over 600 pages, no two hour film (or two and a half hour film in this case), could possibly do it justice. So the producers wisely chose to spit it into two films. Unfortunately, it's still not enough. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 1 probably makes sense if you've read the book - but as is, it's a choppy mess. The film opens with the muggle world completely upended - people going into hiding and basically living in what seems like a war zone. When did this happen? What's going on? Who knows - it's never adequately explained... though the conclusion we are supposed to draw is that at some point Voldemort declared war on the muggle world to get Harry.

But it doesn't stop there. The protagonists, Harry, Ron, and Hermione, move from scene to scene with amazing rapidity, and little explanation. Character's motivations are often inadequately explained, and almost no scene in the movie makes sense if you spend too much time thinking about it. Things happen for no reason, and to top it off, the main characters - who have been through a lot at this point -  act unbelievably stupidly, walking into traps, following ghost deers, and stripping naked and jumping in frozen lakes without telling anyone what they're doing. There's also a ton of amazing coincidences. Finding inscriptions in books like and just knowing they're important, teleporting (what's the point of magic trains and broomsticks anymore) to just the right place next to the lake with the relic they seek by accident... the list goes on and on.

Evidently, even split into two long films, still too much ended up on the cutting room floor. The deleted scenes, available on the DVD elucidate some of the plot holes - but not nearly enough. Unfortunately there's no way to skip this film - it's part one of a two parter, and as bad as it is seeing a disjointed two-and-a-half-hour film, walking into part two without seeing this one first would be ill-advised.


The Good: 
  • School's out - things get real
  • The effects and cinematography are top-notch, as is the acting. In fact, nearly everything that did make it into the film is fantastic.
The Bad:
  • It's a patchwork quilt of scenes strung together. If you're new to the series, don't even think of starting here.
  • Hermione comes across as a total b*** in this one.
Pairing: Order a whole pizza... you're gonna need it!

The Verdict:
*** out of *****

Sunday, October 28, 2018

Harry Potter and the Order of the Half-Blood Prince

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

One of the best HP films, but also one of the most frustrating


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince poster
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince opens with some mysterious forces of darkness destroying a bridge on the Thames for apparently no reason. Maybe it's explained in the books, but if so, the movie omits even a hint of an explanation.
The unexplained destruction of the bridge is just the first of many such plot points in the film. The title refers to the owner of Harry's potions textbook, which is filled with notes on advanced spells that allows him to excel in that class, but later Ginny and Harry decide the book is bad - and there's no explanation for that, nor why rather than destroy it they decide to hide it.
There are many more examples, but you get the idea. Anyway, the film concerns Harry's attempt to stop Draco Malfoy, who he believes is working for Voldemort, but under Snape's protection. When Snape is named the new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher, we know he's going to be the villain du jour.
And that's what makes this one of the best films. With Dumbledore directly involved we finally see some high-level magic employed. There's still a lot of teenage romance, and Quidditch matches, but we also get a lot more magic and destruction.


The Good: 
  • The stakes continue to rise. For the first time the series seems to flirt with real danger
  • The look of the film is much darker thanks to cinematographer Bruno Delbonnel (making it the only HP film nominated for a Best Cinematography Oscar)
The Bad:
  • Harry seems a little tangentially involved in what is more about Dumbledore vs. Voldemort
  • Rowling seems determined to pair Harry with Ginny and Hermione get with Ron

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Halloween (2018)

Halloween (2018)

Halloween movie poster
In 1978, Halloween kicked off the slasher genre. And, while it remains the single best example of the genre, the same cannot be said for its many dreadful sequels and reboots. Beyond spotty, the franchise, like its iconic villain Michael Myers, refuses to die, yet keeps coming back like a flat, emotionless, and often terrible stalker.

For the films' 40th anniversary, it is reboot once again, with a sequel to the original that wisely chooses to ignore all the intervening films. But is it successful? Sort of.

The good part here is that the film reunites Jamie Lee Curtis reprising her role as Laurie Strode with Nick Castle, the original Michael Myers, and writer/director John Carpenter back as Executive Producer, creative consultant, and of course music composer.

The rest of the cast is merely adequate, with some odd casting choices, like Judy Greer as Strode's daughter

The film is pretty much a direct homage to the original, with a lot of references to that film, including some shot-for-shot recreations. In some ways it relies a little too much on this slavish loyalty to the original, yet it is the complete opposite of that film in one crucial way. It lacks a master like Carpenter at the helm. Carpenter's original was filled with tension, with the killing coming after a long buildup. This film however is long on on-screen killing and gore, almost from the get-go, but short on suspense.

Still, given how low the bar has gone with this franchise in the past, we'll take it.

The Good:
  • Jamie Lee Curtis as an older, damaged Laurie Strode is outstanding
  • Carpenter's signature musical score
The Bad:
  • Lacks the jolts of Carpenter's original; to some extent Wes Craven's Scream is a better homage
  • If you have a prisoner who is ONLY known for killing people on Halloween, why for the love of God do you choose to transport him between facilities on October 30th?
  • If Laurie moved to a new house, how did Michael know where to find her?
Stuff to watch for:
  • probably the only mainstream film to reference Repo Man
  • references to every other Halloween film even as it ignores them
Pairing: Popcorn and Apple Cider
The Verdict:
***1/2 out of *****

Halloween (1978)

Many movies are good for Halloween. But one film is Halloween...


Halloween

Halloween movie poster


Halloween changed everything. There are few films that have had as great an impact on the genre.

The story is painfully simple, an escaped lunatic returns to terrorize his old neighborhood on Halloween night. And, while the escaped lunatic story is a time-honored tradition predating the film medium itself, never has it been more effectively presented.

To be fair, the film is a tad bit dated (it predates M.A.D.D. and Nancy Reagan's "Just Say No" campaign big time); and the acting by some of the supporting characters is horrendous - (the children are better actors than some of the teenagers here). But some of the acting is quite excellent - we all know how it launched the career of Jamie Lee Curtis (heir to her mother's scream queen crown) - but also noteworthy is the performance of Donald Pleasence as Dr. Loomis, the relentless and compassionless counterpoint to killer Michael Myers; Loomis will stop at nothing to see Michael stopped, hippocratic oath be damned!

Halloween has a pretty long buildup by modern standards. But all of that is worth it for the last white knuckle twenty minutes, which is some of the scariest, edge-of-your-seat storytelling on celluloid. It's noteworthy that for most of the film, a majority of the characters are totally unaware of the danger, and despite the film's reputation as the King of Slasher movies, there is actually a very minimal amount of gore here.

Other things to watch for in Halloween:


    - John Carpenter created and composed the "stalk and kill" theme music imitated by so many, it's performed by the Bowling Green Philharmonic (John and his friends)

    - the one popular song of the day used in the film is "Don't Fear the Reaper" by Blue Ɩyster Cult, it fits this film like a glove - and the scene where it plays will make you chuckle

    The Thing (later remade by Carpenter) and Forbidden Planet are prominently featured on TVs throughout the movie

    - Can you pick out the characters named after characters in Hitchcock films?

    another classic Cadillac to watch for in this one - this time a black Fleetwood

    ***** out of *****

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

The series begins its struggle to adapt increasingly longer books


Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix poster
The Harry Potter series maintained a mostly upward trajectory across the first quartet of films, but with Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, the series feels like it's hit a plateau.

In his fifth year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, Harry is haunted by dreams of Lord Voldemort. The Ministry of Magic has assigned the school a new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher, nobody believes that Voldemort has returned, and the students have to study for their all-important "OWL" exams.

If this sounds a bit run-of-the-mill... well, it kind of is. But the story isn't without some high notes. Dolores Umbridge, the aforementioned Dark Arts teacher is one of the more interesting antagonists we've seen. All the authority of the Dursley's, but with actual teeth to back up her oppression of Harry. Another highlight comes in the form of Cho Chang, a new potential love interest for Harry.

But overall it seems like the film is struggling to squeeze the book in. For example, at one point Umbridge is believed to have met her fate, but at the end a newspaper reveals she has been removed from her position by the Ministry with no adequate explanation as to how she survived. To top it off, Voldemort's annual return and traditionally vague evil plans are starting to get repetitive that they threaten to turn him into a joke villain.


The Good: 
  • Cho Chang provides a long-needed (non-Hermione) love interest
The Bad:
  • Some of the returning villains like Filch and Voldemort almost seem comical at times
  • Hagrid's half brother Grawp is a bad CGI note in an otherwise mostly good effects symphony
Stuff to watch for:
  • Warwick Davis (his appearances still steal the scene)
Pairing: a bowl of Cheerios ("Cheeri-Owls")

The Verdict:
***1/2 out of *****

Sunday, October 21, 2018

The Paperboy

The Paperboy

Possibly the most underrated film of the 2010s


The Paperboy movie poster
The Paperboy premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in in May of 2012, where it was widely panned. It suffered such critical contempt that it never got more than a limited release in the U.S., and to this day it has only a 44% critic and 33% audience rating on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes.

All those reviewers are wrong.

The film had it's admirers - and not insignificant ones either. The Guardian, and Roger Ebert to name a couple. But they were few and far between. Yet only a year later, UK paper The Daily Telegraph did a complete 180 when it re-reviewed the film upon its general release a year later. It was also nominated for a boatload of awards the year after it's festival premiere. What accounts for this?

We can only speculate. What we do know is that between 2012 and 2013 streaming services (Netflix in particular) began to seriously cut into Hollywood's bottom line resulting in an almost complete emphasis on tentpole special effects films in 2013. Overnight the smaller, stranger dramas like The Paperboy became a rarity - that alone may have warranted the reappraisal.

But the initial ire was likely because of just how sleazy a film The Paperboy is in comparison to both mainstream Hollywood, and the Indie Arthouse world. From at least the late 60s to the mid 90s this was familiar territory for film - from Beyond the Valley of the Dolls to Se7en, there were films exploring the sleazy underbelly of America. But sometime around the turn of the millennium movies became so sanitized that a film like The Paperboy landed like a bomb. And bomb it did, making back only about 10% of it's already modest budget.

But what it delivers is worth checking out - a hot mess of a film set in the corrupt courtrooms, backwater bayous, dim motel rooms, and bright sand beaches of Florida that follows a trio of small town newspapermen, and a prison groupie looking into the suspicious conviction of a lowlife swamp-dweller for the murder of a dictatorial good-ole-boy sheriff, and the predictable downward spiral their lives take once they meet. Think of The Big Easy crossed with Blue Velvet, and you get some idea of what you're in for.

The Good: 
  • Nicole Kidman deserves an Oscar for this one
The Bad:
  • The mystery takes a back seat to just about everything else in the film
Stuff to watch for:
  • vintage cars and soundtrack
Pairing: double rum daiquiris

The Verdict:
***1/2 out of *****

Saturday, October 20, 2018

Searching

Searching

Searching movie poster
When a teenage girl goes missing, her distraught father goes searching for her. The film's title is well chosen - when most of us encounter the word "searching", it's because we're trying to find files on our computer, and Searching's central conceit is that it's told entirely through computer screen shots. As such, it's a whole new twist on the "found footage" genre, as it occurs not through archival tape, but in real time.

After losing his 44 year old wife to cancer, single father David Kim wakes up one morning to discover his daughter never came home the previous night. When he's unable to reach her anywhere he finally calls the police. However, when he begins looking through his daughter's social media accounts, he begins to realize there's a lot he didn't know about his little girl.

Searching is far more entertaining than you'd expect from a film primarily made up of Google searches and Facetime calls. Kind of like a computer nerd version of Taken.

The Good: 
  • enough plot twists to keep you on your toes
The Bad:
  • not everyone's going to be able to enjoy a film where no two people are ever in the same room
Stuff to watch for:
  • numerous Internet in-jokes and references; watch all the nearby posts and comments on screen
Pairing: hot tea

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Thursday, October 18, 2018

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

While Prisoner of Azkaban gets all the attention, Goblet may be even better

As previously mentioned, the Harry Potter films didn't really take off until the third film, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. But that film wasn't without its problems - namely, it drags along in the first half, and seems saddled with a plot that isn't fully fleshed out and thus at times confusing. It's also got a lot of missed opportunities: we never actually understand much about how and why Sirius knew when to break out - and for a film with 'Azkaban' in the title, it would've been nice to see the actual prison, if not the prison break itself.

This time out we get Harry competing with three other wizards in the Tri-Wizard Challenge (the reason for there being four wizards in a tri-wizard challenge is explained in the film). But like all the Harry Potter films, there is more to the challenge than meets the eye; once again sinister forces are at work behind the scenes, and it's up to Harry, Ron, and Hermione to figure things out.

The taut script here doesn't have the the plot holes of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, which is why I rate it somewhat higher.


The Good: 
  • More action than past films
  • Here there be dragons!
  • David Tennant joins the cast
The Bad:
  • why was Fleur back in the contest after failing the underwater challenge?
Stuff to watch for:
  • Warwick Davis (again!)
  • the band the Weird Sisters (a supergroup created for the film) brings some long overdue rock to the series
Pairing: a big plate of hot wings

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Saturday, October 13, 2018

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

If you only watch one Harry Potter film - it should be this one.

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban poster
The first couple Harry Potter films are fun, but never really get as good as you hope they will. Then someone had the bizarre persuading Alfonso Cuaron, who had just gotten a lot of attention for making the sexually explicit Y Tu Mama Tambien, to direct the third film. Well, it worked. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a darker, more grown up film, which is probably appropriate as the "kids" move into high school age.

The story involves a murderous wizard escaping from Azkaban (wizard jail), with his sites set on killing Harry. Hogwarts goes into full lock down mode, when Harry learns that the prisoner, one Sirius Black, is responsible for his parents death, he goes looking for trouble.

The film still follows much of the Harry Potter blueprints so far, so if you liked the previous films, you'll like this one, and if you didn't like the first two, the slightly better story here still isn't going to be enough to convert you. Still if you only see one Harry Potter film, this might be the one to watch.


The Good: 
  • more great actors - this time Gary Oldman and Emma Thompson join the cast
  • a seamless transition from the deceased Richard Harris to Michael Gambon as Dumbledore
The Bad:
  • if magic alone weren't enough of a crutch, this one relies on time travel too 
  • Rowling still has terribly cliched names for characters. There's a Mr. Lupin in this, and someone is a werewolf... I wonder who?
  • At one point Snape gets blasted from a room by Harry, and then doesn't show back up for quite some time, and Harry suffers no repercussions for it
Stuff to watch for:
  • Warwick Davis and Julie Christie in bit parts
  • Why are all the pumpkins in the pumpkin patch already cut?
  • Sadly, this was the last Harry Potter film with a John Williams score
Pairing: a cup of tea, or a large brandy

The Verdict:
**** out of *****

Friday, October 12, 2018

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

A worthy sequel

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets poster
In the second Harry Potter film, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, director Chris Columbus takes us back once again to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

The film opens with Harry, once again, living under virtual house arrest at the Dursley's. There he's visited by Dobby, a "house elf" that tries to stop him from returning to Hogwarts. After Uncle Vernon literally locks and bars Harry in his room, the Weasley's show up in a flying car to break him out.

A number of obstacles block Ron Weasley and Harry from getting back to school, but eventually they do, and the rivalry between Harry and Draco Malfoy heats up with Draco first becoming Slytherin's Quidditch seeker, and later the two chosen to square off in a dueling class.

But eventually a mystery develops as Hogwarts residents start turning up mysteriously petrified, including Hermione, leaving it up to Ron and Harry to try to get to the bottom of things.


The Good: 
  • The classically trained British cast is again excellent, and now includes Kenneth Branagh too.
  • Again the scenes in Hogwart's Castle are visually stunning with ghosts and magic furnishings.
  • Now that Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone got the setup out of the way, Harry gets to have a more full-length adventure

The Bad:
  • Dobby is a CGI character that's more sniveling than Gollum with a touch of Jar-Jar Binks-like attempts at comedy. His scenes are a bit irritating, heavy handed, and even cringe-worthy at times, fortunately they are few and far between
  • There's a few too many lucky coincidences here, including a literal deus ex machina moment when Ron and Harry are rescued by a benevolent magic car
Stuff to watch for:
  • John Cleese's returns as Nearly Headless Nick
  • The extended version includes a scene with former Sex Pistol Edward Tudor-Pole
  • Richard Harris in his final role (as Dumbledore)

Pairing: Hot tea

The Verdict:
***1/2 out of *****

The Eyes of My Mother

When Self-Isolation Leads to Horror The most common horror movie tropes deal with supernatural evil, or sometimes a horror brought about ...